The question of “if” an ideal constitution ‘should’ explicitly commit itself to freedom of the press is open-ended. But the possibility of a free, autonomous, plural and diversified media has become the ideal to be achieved to fully ensure the right to seek, receive and impart information. Finding the suitable platform for state cooperation in this condition of cultivating media frameworks invested with these attributes has constituted the most relevant pieces of the puzzle from the beginning of the 20th century till date.
The opportunity of freedom of expression is a pivotal component of our advancement to improve and radicalize democracies – as people and as "Political Animals". The development of the press along these lines constitutes the defining moment for the level-headed discussions about the complete opportunity for freedom of speech. Ensuring every individual's entitlement to this right allied by an intermediary that radically magnified the outreach of opinions, information, and ideas of mass media sufficiently defined in the constitution. Under this point of view, numerous foundational theories of the contemporary discussion on human rights (the Glorious, American and French Revolutions; the works of John Milton, Alexis de Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill, among others) committed considerable regards for “complete” freedom of speech enshrined in the constitution for the benefit of everyone not just the press in this regard.
Thus, media regulation had begun its improvement as an inseparable unit, ensuring, advancing, and securing the flexibility of freedom of speech that is partially enshrined in most constitutions. Indeed, a definitive objective for managing media ought to be to ensure and develop within this framework of democracy. The ultimate goal for regulating any media should be to protect and deepen a fundamental right of the press in the constitution. For this reason, the most important international instruments on human rights (the United Nations Charter; the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; the Conventions on the Rights of the Child, on the Protection and Promotion of Diversity and Cultural Expressions, on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) deliver issues in alternate points of view. The interior "division of labour" of the United Nations System has designated to UNESCO the duty of working through global collaboration to ensure that constitutions should enact laws that will completely dedicate absolute freedom of the press which should be viable guaranteed through a free, plural, autonomous and expanded media framework in a defined constitution of any state. To satisfy this order, the Organization has benefited from various techniques. A standout amongst the latest and far-reaching one's the conveyance of an arrangement of pointers to survey media advancement in different countries (e.g., the Media Development Indicators: a system for evaluating media improvement) in partnership with Ford Foundation with the conceivable speculation that each valid press may voice out information freely in their absolute authenticity in papers, TV, radio, and internet without fear or favour.
Ideally, a constitution should explicitly commit itself to freedom of the press as Freedom of Expression and Broadcasting Regulation defends that regulatory policy must concentrate on strengthening and reinforcing freedom of expression within a state. Also, on this ground, I stand with the UNESCO international consultant–Andrew Puddephatt, who weaves a talk on his article “The Importance of Self-Regulation of the Media in Upholding Freedom of Expression” as a backdrop for such a constitution. This is a continuous verbal confrontation for the UN; though, along these lines, international administrative regulatory standards are not clearly defined. Be that as it may, we trust that the general principled standards of freedom of expression, of a transparent and independent regulatory policy, and full protection of human rights should also be a central component of this ideal constitution to spell out the right of the press and functionally defended by law.
The author is guest writer from Nigeria.
Comentários